I am wondering about who had displayed and compared
terrain data (e.g. topo_10m) and WRF terrain height (hgt).
If someone did, please spend a little time to read this email, really appreciate your reply.
The fortran code seems working correctly to read those geography data,
e.g. 00001-00120.00001-00120, ... and ... 02041-02160.00961-01080,
total 162 files for 10m resolution, and 648 files for 30s resolution globally,
with "halo" (tile_bdr=3 in the index file) in each file (or tile).
And, the fortran code wrote out in binary format as:
=======================
open(23,file=file(3),status='unknown',form='unformatted'
+ ,convert='little_endian')
=======================
Its ctl file is:
=======================
dset ^all_topo_10m.bin
undef -999999.99
options sequential
title all_30s_topo
xdef 2160 linear 180.0 0.16666667
ydef 1080 linear -90.0 0.16666667
zdef 1 levels 1000
tdef 1 linear 00Z09JUN2017 6hr
vars 1
h 1 0 terrain height [m]
endvars
=======================
However, the WRF-terrain seemingly shift eastward of the geog-terrain.
(I can't upload jpg files here......)
Therefore, my question is, did I make something wrong?
Thanks for reading this email.