em_squall2d_x with HUJI SBM

Anything related to the idealized simulations in WRF.

em_squall2d_x with HUJI SBM

Postby Hwan-Jin Song » Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:43 am

I want to use the HUJI SBM microphysics scheme (30, 32) in em_squall2d_x experiment in the WRF version 3.6.1.
In default setting, i failed to use HUJI SBM scheme.
Here is a error massage.

--- WARNING: traj_opt is zero, but num_traj is not zero; setting num_traj to zero.
--- NOTE: sst_update is 0, setting io_form_auxinput4 = 0 and auxinput4_interval = 0 for all domains
--- NOTE: grid_fdda is 0 for domain 1, setting gfdda interval and ending time to 0 for that domain.
--- NOTE: both grid_sfdda and pxlsm_soil_nudge are 0 for domain 1, setting sgfdda interval and ending time to 0 for that domain.
--- NOTE: obs_nudge_opt is 0 for domain 1, setting obs nudging interval and ending time to 0 for that domain.
bl_pbl_physics /= 4, implies mfshconv must be 0, resetting
--- NOTE: num_soil_layers has been set to 5
WRF V3.6.1 MODEL
DYNAMICS OPTION: Eulerian Mass Coordinate
alloc_space_field: domain 1 , 455783904 bytes allocated
med_initialdata_input: calling input_input
Ideal cases do not support the hypsometric option.
MMINLU error on input
Timing for processing wrfinput file (stream 0) for domain 1: 0.01625 elapsed seconds
SBM FAST: INITIALIZING HUCM
-------------- FATAL CALLED ---------------
FATAL CALLED FROM FILE: <stdin> LINE: 2043
module_mp_fast_sbm: error opening hujisbm_DATA on unit 31
-------------------------------------------
-------------- FATAL CALLED ---------------
FATAL CALLED FROM FILE: <stdin> LINE: 2043
module_mp_fast_sbm: error opening hujisbm_DATA on unit 31
-------------------------------------------
Warning: ieee_inexact is signaling
wrf_abort

When i copy the run directory into em_squall2d_x directory, the use of HUJI scheme was possible.
But, all rain-related variables show zero values.
Here are massages.

--- WARNING: traj_opt is zero, but num_traj is not zero; setting num_traj to zero.
--- NOTE: sst_update is 0, setting io_form_auxinput4 = 0 and auxinput4_interval = 0 for all domains
--- NOTE: grid_fdda is 0 for domain 1, setting gfdda interval and ending time to 0 for that domain.
--- NOTE: both grid_sfdda and pxlsm_soil_nudge are 0 for domain 1, setting sgfdda interval and ending time to 0 for that domain.
--- NOTE: obs_nudge_opt is 0 for domain 1, setting obs nudging interval and ending time to 0 for that domain.
bl_pbl_physics /= 4, implies mfshconv must be 0, resetting
--- NOTE: num_soil_layers has been set to 5
WRF V3.6.1 MODEL
DYNAMICS OPTION: Eulerian Mass Coordinate
alloc_space_field: domain 1 , 455783904 bytes allocated
med_initialdata_input: calling input_input
Ideal cases do not support the hypsometric option.
MMINLU error on input
Timing for processing wrfinput file (stream 0) for domain 1: 0.01467 elapsed seconds
SBM FAST: INITIALIZING HUCM
SBM FAST: file2: succesfull
SBM FAST: file3: succesfull
SBM FAST: file4: succesfull
SBM FAST: file6: succesfull
SBM FAST: file7: succesfull
SBM FAST: Hebrew Univ Cloud model-HUCM
COLL_BREAKUP_INI: COAGULATION AND BREAKUP GRID
ICOAGIBREA XCOAG DCOAG XBREAK DBREAK MWEIGHT
COLL_BREAKUP: READ THE BREAKUP COEFFS
FILE PKIJ: coeff_p.asc
FILE QKJ: coeff_q.asc
COLL_BREAKUP READ: ... OK
Timing for Writing wrfout_d01_0001-01-01_00:00:00 for domain 1: 1.68005 elapsed seconds
Tile Strategy is not specified. Assuming 1D-Y
WRF TILE 1 IS 1 IE 202 JS 1 JE 3
WRF NUMBER OF TILES = 1
SBM FAST: ICE PROCESES ACTIVE
num_chem = 142
Timing for main: time 0001-01-01_00:00:03 on domain 1: 4.34111 elapsed seconds
Timing for main: time 0001-01-01_00:00:06 on domain 1: 2.35475 elapsed seconds
Timing for main: time 0001-01-01_00:00:09 on domain 1: 2.98181 elapsed seconds

Is there any solution to fix the problems above?
The use of other microphsics schemes exept the HUJI SBM succesfully works well.
Hwan-Jin Song
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 12:53 am

Re: em_squall2d_x with HUJI SBM

Postby huashaofeng » Sun Sep 20, 2015 10:46 pm

In the module_mp_fast_sbm.F ,there is some code between CALL FREEZ and CALL MELT, put some "!" before them to make them invalid,then,your problem will be resolved.
huashaofeng
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2015 10:37 pm


Return to Idealized Simulations

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron